TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00924 vs 00926
Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF compared with KGI Global Industry Elite 55 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00924 Fuh Hwa US S&P 500 Growth ETF | 00926 KGI Global Industry Elite 55 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 33.77 | TWD 27.57 |
| Assets under management | TWD 14.7B | TWD 2.8B |
| Beneficiaries | 54,645 | 9,060 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.33% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.45% | 0.65% |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | 0.18% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00924 | 00926 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +16.89% | +20.85% |
| 3-year return | +106.17% | +98.26% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 16.19% | 15.64% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -11.08% | -11.38% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.17 | 1.11 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
26 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.
| Security | 00924 weight | 00926 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVDA US | 13.54% | 14.19% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 10.25% | 11.83% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 6.52% | 15.55% |
| GOOGL · GOOGL US | 4.95% | 4.81% |
| AVGO · AVGO US | 4.35% | 4.93% |
| LLY · LLY US | 3.15% | 6.15% |
| MU · MU US | 2.89% | 3.31% |
| META · META US | 3.51% | 1.89% |
| V · V US | 0.98% | 3.82% |
| MA · MA US | 0.92% | 2.77% |
| CAT · CAT US | 0.85% | 0.95% |
| ABBV · ABBV US | 0.60% | 2.84% |
| APH · APH US | 0.52% | 0.56% |
| PM · PM US | 0.46% | 0.89% |
| KO · KO US | 0.43% | 1.01% |
| NFLX · NFLX US | 0.67% | 0.38% |
| NEM · NEM US | 0.31% | 0.44% |
| BKNG · BKNG US | 0.29% | 0.34% |
| GILD · GILD US | 0.28% | 1.11% |
| TJX · TJX US | 0.22% | 0.47% |
| RCL · RCL US | 0.21% | 0.48% |
| APP · APP US | 0.21% | 0.41% |
| MCD · MCD US | 0.20% | 0.46% |
| HWM · HWM US | 0.20% | 0.33% |
| SPGI · SPGI US | 0.16% | 0.75% |
Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00924 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOOG · GOOG US | 4.62% |
| 2 | AMZN · AMZN US | 3.78% |
| 3 | BRK/B · BRK/B US | 3.01% |
| 4 | AMD · AMD US | 2.45% |
| 5 | TSLA · TSLA US | 2.11% |
| 6 | JPM · JPM US | 1.59% |
| 7 | PLTR · PLTR US | 1.18% |
| 8 | JNJ · JNJ US | 1.00% |
| 9 | AMAT · AMAT US | 0.86% |
| 10 | LRCX · LRCX US | 0.83% |
| 11 | CRWD · CRWD US | 0.71% |
| 12 | RTX · RTX US | 0.69% |
| 13 | ANET · ANET US | 0.61% |
| 14 | GEV · GEV US | 0.61% |
| 15 | CSCO · CSCO US | 0.60% |
| 16 | ORCL · ORCL US | 0.56% |
| 17 | KLAC · KLAC US | 0.54% |
| 18 | SNDK · SNDK US | 0.53% |
| 19 | MS · MS US | 0.47% |
| 20 | PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 0.47% |
| 21 | GS · GS US | 0.46% |
| 22 | AMGN · AMGN US | 0.43% |
| 23 | GE · GE US | 0.42% |
| 24 | ISRG · ISRG US | 0.41% |
| 25 | AXP · AXP US | 0.38% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00924 | 00926 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Apr 26, 2023 | Jun 2, 2023 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 28, 2026 | Oct 28, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 146 | 55 |
| Premium / discount | +0.66% | +0.22% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0092400926
Current market valueTWD 337.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00926 units12,248
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 18K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.