TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00736 vs 00919
Cathay FTSE Emerging Markets ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00736 Cathay FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 31.41 | TWD 29.57 |
| Assets under management | TWD 206M | TWD 514.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 513 | 1,375,210 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 1.75% | 9.67% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.50% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.16% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00736 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +32.39% | +52.25% |
| 3-year return | +53.05% | +81.28% |
| 5-year return | +50.50% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 16.18% | 18.08% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.53% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.94 | 2.09 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
11 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00736 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2330 · 2330 | 13.89% |
| 2 | 700 HK · TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD | 3.46% |
| 3 | 9988 HK · ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD | 2.46% |
| 4 | 2454 · 2454 | 1.53% |
| 5 | 2317 · 2317 | 0.97% |
| 6 | 939 HK · CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK-H | 0.96% |
| 7 | RELIANCE IN · RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LTD | 0.84% |
| 8 | HDFCB IN · HDFC BANK LIMITED | 0.82% |
| 9 | ICICIBC IN · ICICI Bank Ltd | 0.75% |
| 10 | 2308 · 2308 | 0.73% |
| 11 | 1398 HK · IND & COMM BK OF CHINA-H | 0.72% |
| 12 | 1801 HK · INNOVENT BIOLOGICS INC | 0.63% |
| 13 | 1303 · 1303 | 0.62% |
| 14 | 2395 · 2395 | 0.62% |
| 15 | BHARTI IN · BHARTI AIRTEL LTD | 0.59% |
| 16 | 6160 HK · BEIGENE LTD | 0.56% |
| 17 | HUVR IN · HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LTD | 0.56% |
| 18 | MSIL IN · MARUTI SUZUKE INDIA LTD | 0.53% |
| 19 | PBK MK · PUBLIC BANK BERHAD | 0.53% |
| 20 | TTAN IN · TITAN CO LTD | 0.53% |
| 21 | 3231 · 3231 | 0.49% |
| 22 | 175 HK · GEELY AUTOMOBILE HOLDING LTD | 0.49% |
| 23 | 3711 · 3711 | 0.48% |
| 24 | 2886 · 2886 | 0.48% |
| 25 | 2412 · 2412 | 0.48% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00736 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 11, 2018 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 208 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | -0.70% | -0.03% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0073600919
Current market valueTWD 314.1K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units10,622
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 24.9K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.