TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00709 vs 00878
Fubon FTSE Developed Europe ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00709 Fubon FTSE Developed Europe ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 41.50 | TWD 32.43 |
| Assets under management | TWD 629M | TWD 566.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 2,385 | 1,617,951 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.80% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.50% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.29% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00709 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +32.33% | +62.99% |
| 3-year return | +54.97% | +73.71% |
| 5-year return | +73.93% | +120.65% |
| 1-year volatility | 16.08% | 20.51% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -10.96% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.79 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00709 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ASML NA · ASML Holding NV | 4.35% |
| 2 | HSBA LN · HSBC Holdings PLC | 2.48% |
| 3 | ROP SE · ROCHE HOLDING AG | 2.08% |
| 4 | NOVN SE · Novartis AG | 1.98% |
| 5 | NESN SE · Nestle SA | 1.77% |
| 6 | AZN LN · AstraZeneca PLC | 1.74% |
| 7 | SHEL LN · SHELL PLC | 1.69% |
| 8 | SIE GY · Siemens AG | 1.61% |
| 9 | SAN SQ · Banco Santander SA | 1.38% |
| 10 | ALV GY · Allianz SE | 1.28% |
| 11 | SAP GY · SAP SE | 1.25% |
| 12 | SU FP · Schneider Electric SE | 1.21% |
| 13 | TTE FP · TOTALENERGIES SE | 1.14% |
| 14 | RR/ LN · Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC | 1.12% |
| 15 | UBSG SE · UBS Group AG | 1.11% |
| 16 | NOVOB DC · NOVO NORDISK A/S | 1.10% |
| 17 | IBE SQ · IBERDROLA SA | 1.10% |
| 18 | BBVA SQ · Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA | 1.05% |
| 19 | ABBN SE · ABB Ltd | 1.02% |
| 20 | UCG IM · UniCredit SpA | 0.96% |
| 21 | ULVR LN · Unilever PLC | 0.93% |
| 22 | AIR FP · Airbus SE | 0.93% |
| 23 | SAF FP · Safran SA | 0.92% |
| 24 | MC FP · LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE | 0.91% |
| 25 | ENR GY · SIEMENS ENERGY AG | 0.86% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00709 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Aug 15, 2017 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 444 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | -0.29% | +0.53% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0070900878
Current market valueTWD 415K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units12,796
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 24.1K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.