TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00646 vs 00878
Yuanta S&P 500 ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00646 Yuanta S&P 500 ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 77.60 | TWD 35.09 |
| Assets under management | TWD 49.6B | TWD 661.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 114,568 | 1,668,893 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 7.10% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.50% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.21% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00646 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +22.30% | +75.36% |
| 3-year return | +79.13% | +103.20% |
| 5-year return | +105.89% | +138.58% |
| 1-year volatility | 12.62% | 21.07% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -7.43% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.94 | 3.26 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 22, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00646 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA UQ · NVIDIA CORP | 8.06% |
| 2 | AAPL UQ · APPLE INC | 7.25% |
| 3 | MSFT UQ · MICROSOFT CORP | 5.46% |
| 4 | AMZN UQ · AMAZON.COM INC | 3.72% |
| 5 | GOOGL UQ · ALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.05% |
| 6 | AVGO UQ · BROADCOM INC | 2.53% |
| 7 | GOOG UQ · ALPHABET INC-CL C | 2.44% |
| 8 | META UQ · META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 2.40% |
| 9 | MU UQ · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.73% |
| 10 | TSLA UQ · TESLA INC | 1.55% |
| 11 | AMD UQ · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 1.47% |
| 12 | BRK/B UN · BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B | 1.37% |
| 13 | JPM UN · JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 1.37% |
| 14 | LLY UN · ELI LILLY & CO | 1.37% |
| 15 | XOM UN · EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 0.95% |
| 16 | JNJ UN · JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.95% |
| 17 | V UN · VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES | 0.92% |
| 18 | INTC UQ · INTEL CORP | 0.89% |
| 19 | WMT UQ · WALMART INC | 0.70% |
| 20 | ABBV UN · ABBVIE INC | 0.68% |
| 21 | MA UN · MASTERCARD INC - A | 0.67% |
| 22 | CSCO UQ · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 0.64% |
| 23 | PLTR UQ · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 0.62% |
| 24 | CVX UN · CHEVRON CORP | 0.59% |
| 25 | COST UQ · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 0.58% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00646 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Yuanta Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Dec 14, 2015 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Sep 23, 2026 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 22, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 502 | 29 |
| Premium / discount | +0.23% | 0.00% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0064600878
Current market valueTWD 776K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units22,114
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 55.1K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.