TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00639 vs 00878
Fubon SZSE 100 ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00639 Fubon SZSE 100 ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 16.83 | TWD 32.43 |
| Assets under management | TWD 1.6B | TWD 566.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 5,740 | 1,617,951 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.80% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.99% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.10% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00639 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +47.24% | +62.99% |
| 3-year return | +33.47% | +73.71% |
| 5-year return | +3.89% | +120.65% |
| 1-year volatility | 22.92% | 20.51% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -13.53% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.06 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00639 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 300750 CH · 300750 CH | 10.61% |
| 2 | 300308 CH · 300308 CH | 8.05% |
| 3 | 300502 CH · 300502 CH | 5.08% |
| 4 | 000333 CH · 000333 CH | 4.35% |
| 5 | 002371 CH · 002371 CH | 2.82% |
| 6 | 002475 CH · 002475 CH | 2.79% |
| 7 | 300059 CH · 300059 CH | 2.66% |
| 8 | 002594 CH · 002594 CH | 2.50% |
| 9 | 002384 CH · 002384 CH | 2.22% |
| 10 | 000651 CH · 000651 CH | 1.86% |
| 11 | 000725 CH · 000725 CH | 1.85% |
| 12 | 300274 CH · 300274 CH | 1.57% |
| 13 | 000858 CH · 000858 CH | 1.45% |
| 14 | 000338 CH · 000338 CH | 1.45% |
| 15 | 002463 CH · 002463 CH | 1.45% |
| 16 | 300408 CH · 300408 CH | 1.44% |
| 17 | 300124 CH · 300124 CH | 1.32% |
| 18 | 300476 CH · 300476 CH | 1.19% |
| 19 | 002142 CH · 002142 CH | 1.11% |
| 20 | 000063 CH · 000063 CH | 1.10% |
| 21 | 300394 CH · 300394 CH | 1.10% |
| 22 | 000001 CH · 000001 CH | 1.01% |
| 23 | 002714 CH · 002714 CH | 0.99% |
| 24 | 300760 CH · 300760 CH | 0.99% |
| 25 | 000100 CH · 000100 CH | 0.93% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00639 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 9, 2015 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 93 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +1.08% | +0.53% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0063900878
Current market valueTWD 168.3K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units5,189
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 9.8K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.