TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00988A vs 00997A
UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF compared with Capital US Growth Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00988A UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF | 00997A Capital US Growth Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 15.17 | TWD 10.80 |
| Assets under management | TWD 46.6B | TWD 11.3B |
| Beneficiaries | 219,694 | 62,611 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 3.43% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 1.40% | — |
| Custody fee | — | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00988A | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 50.72% | 40.81% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -40.33% | -30.53% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.04 | 0.07 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
20 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.
| Security | 00988A weight | 00997A weight |
|---|---|---|
| CRWD · CRWD US | 4.04% | 4.89% |
| LITE · LITE US | 4.58% | 3.98% |
| NVDA · NVDA US | 4.28% | 3.66% |
| 3037 · 3037 | 6.05% | 3.37% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 3.75% | 3.21% |
| SPCX · SPCX US | 5.48% | 3.11% |
| OKTA · OKTA US | 3.05% | 2.97% |
| PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 4.46% | 2.96% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 2.95% | 4.16% |
| MRVL · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.59% | 3.02% |
| AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.97% | 2.24% |
| BE · BE US | 7.04% | 1.90% |
| 2383 · 2383 | 2.66% | 1.72% |
| INTC · INTC US | 2.62% | 1.71% |
| 2330 · 2330 | 1.64% | 2.80% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 4.72% | 1.34% |
| 009150 · 009150 KS | 2.68% | 1.20% |
| MU · MU US | 1.08% | 3.58% |
| 2454 · 2454 | 0.72% | 0.87% |
| SNOW · SNOW US | 2.33% | 0.58% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00988A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3017 · 3017 | 4.08% |
| 2 | NOW · SERVICENOW INC | 2.37% |
| 3 | 6787 · MEIKO ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 2.20% |
| 4 | TWLO · TWILIO INC - A | 2.09% |
| 5 | 1303 · 1303 | 1.91% |
| 6 | NET · CLOUDFLARE INC - CLASS A | 1.79% |
| 7 | ZS · ZSCALER INC | 1.76% |
| 8 | 6981 · MURATA MANUFACTURING CO LTD | 1.45% |
| 9 | 3443 · 3443 | 1.38% |
| 10 | IFX · INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG | 1.22% |
| 11 | 6223 · 6223 | 1.19% |
| 12 | META · META US | 1.05% |
| 13 | 6762 · TDK CORP | 0.85% |
| 14 | 600183 · Shengyi Technology Co Ltd-A.600183 ch | 0.70% |
| 15 | 2308 · 2308 | 0.66% |
| 16 | 992 · LENOVO GROUP LTD | 0.62% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00988A | 00997A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Uni-President Asset Management | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Nov 5, 2025 | Apr 14, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 28, 2026 | Oct 27, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 36 | 48 |
| Premium / discount | +0.60% | +0.47% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00988A00997A
Current market valueTWD 151.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00997A units14,046
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 5.2K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.