TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00988A vs 00990A
UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF compared with Yuanta Global AI New Economy Active ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00988A UPAMC Global Innovation Active ETF | 00990A Yuanta Global AI New Economy Active ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 15.17 | TWD 14.70 |
| Assets under management | TWD 46.6B | TWD 33.8B |
| Beneficiaries | 219,694 | 116,931 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 1.40% | 0.90% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.15% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00988A | 00990A |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 50.72% | 49.38% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -40.33% | -37.18% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.04 | 1.23 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
23 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.
| Security | 00988A weight | 00990A weight |
|---|---|---|
| BE · BLOOM ENERGY CORP- A | 7.04% | 5.44% |
| PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 4.72% | 4.99% |
| LITE · LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | 4.58% | 5.15% |
| NVDA · NVIDIA CORP | 4.28% | 5.74% |
| AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.97% | 4.47% |
| MSFT · MICROSOFT CORP | 3.75% | 5.07% |
| SPCX · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A | 5.48% | 3.54% |
| NOW · SERVICENOW INC | 2.37% | 3.27% |
| SNOW · SNOWFLAKE INC | 2.33% | 3.27% |
| 3037 · 3037 | 6.05% | 2.15% |
| 2383 · 2383 | 2.66% | 1.97% |
| CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC - A | 4.04% | 1.88% |
| PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 4.46% | 1.80% |
| NET · CLOUDFLARE INC - CLASS A | 1.79% | 2.72% |
| ZS · ZSCALER INC | 1.76% | 2.39% |
| OKTA · OKTA INC | 3.05% | 1.75% |
| 2330 · 2330 | 1.64% | 2.88% |
| 3017 · 3017 | 4.08% | 1.49% |
| MU · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.08% | 3.55% |
| 3443 · 3443 | 1.38% | 1.05% |
| META · META PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 1.05% | 3.76% |
| 2454 · 2454 | 0.72% | 2.05% |
| 2308 · 2308 | 0.66% | 1.91% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00988A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL · AAPL US | 2.95% |
| 2 | 009150 · Samsung Electro-Mechanics co(009150 ks) | 2.68% |
| 3 | INTC · INTEL CORP | 2.62% |
| 4 | MRVL · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.59% |
| 5 | 6787 · MEIKO ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 2.20% |
| 6 | TWLO · TWILIO INC - A | 2.09% |
| 7 | 1303 · 1303 | 1.91% |
| 8 | 6981 · MURATA MANUFACTURING CO LTD | 1.45% |
| 9 | IFX · INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG | 1.22% |
| 10 | 6223 · 6223 | 1.19% |
| 11 | 6762 · TDK CORP | 0.85% |
| 12 | 600183 · Shengyi Technology Co Ltd-A.600183 ch | 0.70% |
| 13 | 992 · LENOVO GROUP LTD | 0.62% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00988A | 00990A |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Uni-President Asset Management | Yuanta Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Nov 5, 2025 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 28, 2026 | Oct 28, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 36 | 39 |
| Premium / discount | +0.60% | +0.41% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00988A00990A
Current market valueTWD 151.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00990A units10,319
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.