TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

009824 vs 00997A

CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND compared with Capital US Growth Active ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap36.38%Low · 24 common securities
Higher 1-year return—— vs —
Higher distribution yield00997A— vs 3.43%
Lower annual fee0098240.92% vs —

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

009824+6.92%10.35 TWD・+0.67 TWD
00997A+4.35%10.80 TWD・+0.45 TWD

Key metrics

Metric009824
CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND
00997A
Capital US Growth Active ETF
Latest closeTWD 10.35TWD 10.80
Assets under managementTWD 4.7BTWD 11.3B
Beneficiaries42,33962,611
Trailing 12-month distribution yield—3.43%
Total expense ratio——
Management fee0.80%—
Custody fee0.12%—

Performance and risk

Metric00982400997A
1-year return——
3-year return——
5-year return——
1-year volatility19.73%40.81%
1-year max drawdown-7.93%-30.53%
1-year Sharpe ratio0.270.07

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector00982400997A
Electronic Components
0.00%
5.09%
Semiconductors
0.00%
3.67%

Common holdings

24 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.

Security009824 weight00997A weight
AAPL · AAPL US21.24%4.16%
NVDA · NVDA US19.08%3.66%
MU · MU US7.71%3.58%
MSFT · MSFT US7.11%3.21%
GOOGL · ALPHABET INC-CL A3.26%2.47%
AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES2.83%2.24%
AMAT · AMAT US1.83%1.78%
LRCX · LRCX US2.71%1.52%
SNDK · SNDK US1.50%2.25%
STX · STX US1.65%1.45%
PLTR · PLTR US3.05%1.34%
CRWD · CRWD US1.34%4.89%
AVGO · AVGO US6.72%1.08%
CSCO · CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.43%1.02%
INTC · INTC US0.96%1.71%
FTNT · FTNT US0.95%2.58%
TXN · TXN US1.39%0.88%
WDC · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP0.86%1.28%
KLAC · KLA CORP1.18%0.50%
PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc0.49%2.96%
MRVL · Marvell Technology Inc0.48%3.02%
ADI · ADI US0.39%1.07%
CDNS · CDNS US0.27%0.43%
DDOG · DDOG US0.26%0.96%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security009824 weight
1AMZN · AMZN US3.29%
2TSLA · TSLA US2.53%
3META · META US1.91%
4NFLX · NFLX US0.43%
5ADP · ADP US0.34%
6ADBE · ADBE US0.30%
7QCOM · QCOM US0.29%
8APP · APP US0.23%
9MPWR · MPWR US0.23%
10MELI · MELI US0.17%
11CTAS · CTAS US0.16%
12ADSK · ADSK US0.14%
13EBAY · EBAY US0.13%
14SNPS · SNPS US0.12%
15HONA · HONA US0.11%
16INTU · INTU US0.11%
17RKLB · RKLB US0.10%
18NXPI · NXPI US0.09%
19HON · HON US0.09%
20MCHP · MCHP US0.07%
21PYPL · PYPL US0.06%
22PAYX · PAYX US0.06%
23ROP · ROP US0.06%
24MSTR · MSTR US0.06%
25AXON · AXON US0.05%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00982400997A
IssuerCapital Investment TrustCapital Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark——
Listing dateJun 25, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Latest market dateOct 29, 2026Oct 29, 2026
Holdings dateOct 28, 2026Oct 27, 2026
Eligible stock positions5148
Premium / discount+0.29%+0.47%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00982400997A
Current market valueTWD 103.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00997A units9,583
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 3.6K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.