TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

009816 vs 00991A

KGI Taiwan TOP 50 ETF compared with Fuh Hwa Taiwan Future 50 Active ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap31.70%Low · 37 common securities
Higher 1-year return—— vs —
Higher distribution yield00991A— vs 4.56%
Lower annual fee0098160.10% vs 1.04%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

009816+19.93%16.01 TWD・+2.66 TWD
00991A+19.97%16.88 TWD・+2.81 TWD

Key metrics

Metric009816
KGI Taiwan TOP 50 ETF
00991A
Fuh Hwa Taiwan Future 50 Active ETF
Latest closeTWD 16.01TWD 16.88
Assets under managementTWD 219.5BTWD 71.5B
Beneficiaries986,544320,551
Trailing 12-month distribution yield—4.56%
Total expense ratio——
Management fee0.07%1.00%
Custody fee0.03%0.04%

Performance and risk

Metric00981600991A
1-year return——
3-year return——
5-year return——
1-year volatility32.06%44.52%
1-year max drawdown-17.44%-34.32%
1-year Sharpe ratio2.812.21

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector00981600991A
Semiconductors
51.60%
40.43%
Electronic Components
8.89%
41.21%
Financials
21.13%
0.01%
Computers & Peripherals
4.31%
6.23%
Communications & Networking
3.60%
2.95%
Plastics
1.57%
4.55%
Other Electronics
3.75%
0.01%
Optoelectronics
0.85%
1.41%
Utilities & Energy
0.21%
1.83%
Transportation
0.49%
0.00%
Biotechnology & Healthcare
0.39%
0.00%
Food
0.33%
0.00%

Common holdings

37 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.

Security009816 weight00991A weight
2330 · 233040.03%14.50%
2454 · 24545.66%6.07%
3711 · 37112.04%2.34%
1303 · 13031.57%4.55%
2383 · 23831.44%9.67%
3037 · 30371.36%7.96%
3017 · 30170.97%6.22%
2327 · 23270.92%4.19%
2408 · 24080.92%7.98%
2059 · 20590.65%6.81%
3653 · 36530.62%3.21%
3008 · 30080.51%1.41%
8046 · 80460.28%6.08%
6505 · 65050.21%1.83%
7769 · 77690.52%0.01%
2382 · 23820.80%0.00%
2317 · 23172.74%0.00%
2345 · 23450.80%0.00%
2360 · 23600.70%0.00%
6669 · 66690.61%0.00%
2603 · 26030.49%0.00%
2308 · 23082.88%0.00%
2881 · 28811.44%0.00%
3231 · 32310.53%0.00%
3665 · 36650.31%0.00%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security009816 weight
12892 · 28921.45%
25880 · 58800.93%
33443 · 34430.63%
42301 · 23010.49%
52344 · 23440.48%
66446 · 64460.39%
74958 · 49580.38%
82368 · 23680.36%
93481 · 34810.34%
101216 · 12160.33%
112395 · 23950.30%
123045 · 30450.27%
134904 · 49040.24%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00981600991A
Issuer—Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark——
Listing dateFeb 3, 2026Dec 18, 2025
Latest market dateOct 29, 2026Oct 29, 2026
Holdings dateOct 28, 2026Oct 29, 2026
Eligible stock positions5050
Premium / discount+0.19%+0.24%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00981600991A
Current market valueTWD 160.1K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00991A units9,484
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 7.3K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.