TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009811 vs 009815
UPAMC NYSE US 50 ETF compared with United Magnificent 7 Plus US Big Tech ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009811 UPAMC NYSE US 50 ETF | 009815 United Magnificent 7 Plus US Big Tech ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 13.68 | TWD 11.91 |
| Assets under management | TWD 3.1B | TWD 5B |
| Beneficiaries | 22,156 | 28,896 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.35% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.12% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009811 | 009815 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +17.42% | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 14.20% | 20.33% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -10.01% | -8.69% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.4 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
21 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 28, 2026.
| Security | 009811 weight | 009815 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPL · AAPL US | 11.48% | 14.73% |
| NVDA · NVDA US | 11.46% | 14.95% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 8.81% | 11.63% |
| AMZN · AMZN US | 5.64% | 7.36% |
| GOOGL · GOOGL US | 4.25% | 9.95% |
| AVGO · AVGO US | 3.62% | 4.49% |
| META · META US | 3.09% | 4.35% |
| TSLA · TSLA US | 3.00% | 4.60% |
| MU · MU US | 2.37% | 2.94% |
| AMD · AMD US | 2.06% | 2.55% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 1.00% | 1.24% |
| CSCO · CSCO US | 0.99% | 1.12% |
| INTC · INTC US | 0.97% | 1.08% |
| PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 0.74% | 0.91% |
| AMAT · AMAT US | 0.71% | 0.88% |
| LRCX · LRCX US | 0.68% | 0.84% |
| TXN · TXN US | 0.64% | 0.79% |
| CRWD · CRWD US | 0.60% | 0.74% |
| NFLX · NFLX US | 0.59% | 0.73% |
| ORCL · ORCL US | 0.53% | 0.63% |
| KLAC · KLAC US | 0.45% | 0.56% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009811 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOOG · ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.69% |
| 2 | LLY · ELI LILLY & CO | 2.47% |
| 3 | JPM · JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 2.02% |
| 4 | BRK/B · BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B | 1.73% |
| 5 | XOM · EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.67% |
| 6 | V · VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES | 1.55% |
| 7 | JNJ · JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 1.47% |
| 8 | WMT · WAL-MART STORES INC | 1.20% |
| 9 | ABBV · ABBVIE INC | 1.15% |
| 10 | MA · MASTERCARD INC - A | 1.12% |
| 11 | CVX · CHEVRON CORP | 1.02% |
| 12 | COST · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 1.00% |
| 13 | KO · COCA-COLA CO/THE | 0.88% |
| 14 | PG · PROCTER & GAMBLE CO/THE | 0.84% |
| 15 | UNH · UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INC | 0.83% |
| 16 | BAC · BANK OF AMERICA CORP | 0.80% |
| 17 | MRK · MERCK & CO. INC. | 0.79% |
| 18 | CAT · CATERPILLAR INC | 0.74% |
| 19 | HD · HOME DEPOT INC | 0.72% |
| 20 | PM · PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL | 0.71% |
| 21 | GE · GENERAL ELECTRIC CO | 0.70% |
| 22 | GS · GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC | 0.60% |
| 23 | RTX · RTX CORP | 0.59% |
| 24 | WFC · WELLS FARGO & CO | 0.57% |
| 25 | AMGN · AMGEN INC | 0.55% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009811 | 009815 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Uni-President Asset Management | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 29, 2025 | Jan 26, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 27, 2026 | Oct 27, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 51 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +0.44% | -0.83% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009811009815
Current market valueTWD 136.8K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009815 units11,486
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.