TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
009800 vs 009811
CTBC NASDAQ 100 ETF compared with UPAMC NYSE US 50 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 009800 CTBC NASDAQ 100 ETF | 009811 UPAMC NYSE US 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 13.39 | TWD 13.68 |
| Assets under management | TWD 4.2B | TWD 3.1B |
| Beneficiaries | 19,654 | 22,156 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | 0.35% |
| Custody fee | 0.14% | 0.12% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 009800 | 009811 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +20.63% | +17.42% |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 18.31% | 14.20% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.07% | -10.01% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.27 | 1.4 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
25 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 28, 2026.
| Security | 009800 weight | 009811 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVDA US | 8.08% | 11.46% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 7.80% | 11.48% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 6.08% | 8.81% |
| AMZN · AMZN US | 4.21% | 5.64% |
| TSLA · TSLA US | 3.30% | 3.00% |
| GOOGL · GOOGL US | 2.90% | 4.25% |
| META · META US | 2.84% | 3.09% |
| GOOG · ALPHABET INC-CL C | 2.70% | 3.69% |
| AVGO · AVGO US | 2.51% | 3.62% |
| MU · MU US | 4.46% | 2.37% |
| AMD · AMD US | 3.89% | 2.06% |
| WMT · WMT US | 2.47% | 1.20% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 1.94% | 1.00% |
| COST · COST US | 1.87% | 1.00% |
| CSCO · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.87% | 0.99% |
| INTC · INTC US | 2.09% | 0.97% |
| PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.39% | 0.74% |
| AMAT · AMAT US | 1.34% | 0.71% |
| LRCX · LRCX US | 1.28% | 0.68% |
| TXN · TXN US | 1.20% | 0.64% |
| CRWD · CRWD US | 1.17% | 0.60% |
| NFLX · NFLX US | 1.11% | 0.59% |
| AMGN · AMGN US | 1.03% | 0.55% |
| KLAC · KLAC US | 0.85% | 0.45% |
| SNDK · SNDK US | 0.81% | 0.43% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 009800 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPCX · SPCX US | 2.71% |
| 2 | LIN · Linde PLC | 1.00% |
| 3 | MRVL · Marvell Technology Inc | 0.91% |
| 4 | ADI · ADI US | 0.88% |
| 5 | SHOP · SHOP US | 0.85% |
| 6 | GILD · GILD US | 0.84% |
| 7 | QCOM · QCOM US | 0.82% |
| 8 | PEP · PEP US | 0.77% |
| 9 | TMUS · TMUS US | 0.67% |
| 10 | ISRG · ISRG US | 0.67% |
| 11 | ASML · ASML US | 0.65% |
| 12 | STX · STX US | 0.64% |
| 13 | WDC · WDC US | 0.58% |
| 14 | FTNT · FTNT US | 0.58% |
| 15 | VRTX · VRTX US | 0.56% |
| 16 | SBUX · SBUX US | 0.50% |
| 17 | ADP · ADP US | 0.50% |
| 18 | BKNG · BKNG US | 0.48% |
| 19 | MAR · MAR US | 0.43% |
| 20 | ARM · ARM US | 0.42% |
| 21 | ADBE · ADBE US | 0.42% |
| 22 | CSX · CSX Corp | 0.41% |
| 23 | CDNS · CDNS US | 0.40% |
| 24 | DDOG · Datadog Inc | 0.40% |
| 25 | CEG · CEG US | 0.39% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 009800 | 009811 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Uni-President Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Feb 11, 2025 | Jul 29, 2025 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 27, 2026 | Oct 27, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 101 | 51 |
| Premium / discount | -0.52% | +0.44% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
009800009811
Current market valueTWD 133.9K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009811 units9,788
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.