TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00911 vs 00919
Mega ICE Semiconductor ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00911 Mega ICE Semiconductor ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 53.65 | TWD 29.57 |
| Assets under management | TWD 1.4B | TWD 514.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 13,191 | 1,375,210 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 8.39% | 9.67% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.85% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00911 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +130.21% | +52.11% |
| 3-year return | +176.49% | +81.63% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 39.83% | 18.08% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -29.34% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.98 | 2.09 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00911 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA US · NVDA US | 8.38% |
| 2 | AMD US · AMD US | 8.24% |
| 3 | MU US · MU US | 7.90% |
| 4 | AVGO US · AVGO US | 7.87% |
| 5 | INTC US · INTC US | 5.04% |
| 6 | AMAT US · AMAT US | 4.89% |
| 7 | TSM US · TSM US | 4.54% |
| 8 | KLAC US · KLAC US | 4.25% |
| 9 | TXN US · TXN US | 4.14% |
| 10 | LRCX US · LRCX US | 4.09% |
| 11 | ADI US · ADI US | 4.02% |
| 12 | MRVL US · MRVL US | 3.91% |
| 13 | MPWR US · MPWR US | 3.51% |
| 14 | NXPI US · NXPI US | 3.46% |
| 15 | TER US · TER US | 3.08% |
| 16 | QCOM US · QCOM US | 2.73% |
| 17 | ASML US · ASML US | 2.40% |
| 18 | ALAB US · ASTERA LABS INC | 2.27% |
| 19 | MCHP US · MCHP US | 2.23% |
| 20 | ON US · ON US | 1.82% |
| 21 | CRDO US · CRDO US | 1.80% |
| 22 | ASX US · ASX US | 1.12% |
| 23 | ENTG US · ENTG US | 0.97% |
| 24 | MTSI US · MTSI US | 0.94% |
| 25 | UMC US · UMC US | 0.85% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00911 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Mega International Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 27, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +3.59% | -0.03% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0091100919
Current market valueTWD 536.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units18,143
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 6.9K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.