TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00908 vs 00919
Fubon Global Dividend REITs and Infrastructure ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00908 Fubon Global Dividend REITs and Infrastructure ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 15.84 | TWD 29.57 |
| Assets under management | TWD 563M | TWD 514.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 2,790 | 1,375,210 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 3.19% | 9.67% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.65% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.18% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00908 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +29.41% | +52.25% |
| 3-year return | +40.28% | +81.28% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 10.73% | 18.08% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -8.76% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.42 | 2.09 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00908 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 576 HK · 576 HK | 4.12% |
| 2 | PHP LN · PRIMARY HEALTH PROPERTIES | 4.10% |
| 3 | 823 HK · 823 HK | 4.05% |
| 4 | LMP LN · LMP LN | 3.74% |
| 5 | LAND LN · LAND SECURITIES GROUP PLC | 3.72% |
| 6 | SUPR LN · SUPERMARKET INCOME REIT PLC | 3.72% |
| 7 | CICT SP · CAPITALAND INTEGRATED COMMER | 3.66% |
| 8 | 144 HK · 144 HK | 3.65% |
| 9 | PK US · PARK HOTELS & RESORTS INC | 3.57% |
| 10 | LREIT SP · LENDLEASE GLOBAL | 3.54% |
| 11 | KREIT SP · KEPPEL REIT | 3.48% |
| 12 | MRP US · MILLROSE PROPERTIES INC | 3.44% |
| 13 | CARM FP · CARMILA SA | 3.29% |
| 14 | MPACT SP · MAPLETREE PAN ASIA COMMERCIAL | 3.29% |
| 15 | BLND LN · BRITISH LAND CO PLC | 3.20% |
| 16 | DEI US · DOUGLAS EMMETT INC | 3.16% |
| 17 | 177 HK · 177 HK | 3.16% |
| 18 | GNL US · GLOBAL NET LEASE INC | 3.16% |
| 19 | GFC FP · Gecina SA | 3.10% |
| 20 | ALX AU · ATLAS ARTERIA LTD | 2.99% |
| 21 | FCPT US · FOUR CORNERS PROPERTY TRUST IN | 2.99% |
| 22 | MINT SP · MAPLETREE INDUSTRIAL TRUST | 2.97% |
| 23 | SUN SP · SUNTEC REIT | 2.89% |
| 24 | FCT SP · FRASERS CENTREPOINT TRUST | 2.88% |
| 25 | BYG LN · BIG YELLOW GROUP PLC | 2.83% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00908 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | May 20, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | -0.50% | -0.03% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0090800919
Current market valueTWD 158.4K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units5,356
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 10.3K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.