TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00908 vs 00919
Fubon Global Dividend REITs and Infrastructure ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00908 Fubon Global Dividend REITs and Infrastructure ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 14.87 | TWD 31.96 |
| Assets under management | TWD 514M | TWD 609.3B |
| Beneficiaries | 2,725 | 1,419,036 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 3.40% | 10.70% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.65% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.18% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00908 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +13.80% | +64.94% |
| 3-year return | +36.92% | +97.91% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 10.57% | 18.58% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -8.76% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.93 | 2.6 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 18, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00908 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHP LN · PRIMARY HEALTH PROPERTIES | 4.21% |
| 2 | 144 HK · 144 HK | 4.11% |
| 3 | 823 HK · 823 HK | 3.95% |
| 4 | 576 HK · 576 HK | 3.90% |
| 5 | SUPR LN · SUPERMARKET INCOME REIT PLC | 3.87% |
| 6 | MRP US · MILLROSE PROPERTIES INC | 3.70% |
| 7 | PK US · PARK HOTELS & RESORTS INC | 3.67% |
| 8 | LMP LN · LMP LN | 3.62% |
| 9 | LREIT SP · LENDLEASE GLOBAL | 3.53% |
| 10 | LAND LN · LAND SECURITIES GROUP PLC | 3.53% |
| 11 | CICT SP · CAPITALAND INTEGRATED COMMER | 3.53% |
| 12 | 177 HK · 177 HK | 3.45% |
| 13 | KREIT SP · KEPPEL REIT | 3.43% |
| 14 | GNL US · GLOBAL NET LEASE INC | 3.35% |
| 15 | 8963 JP · INVINCIBLE INVESTMENT CORP | 3.20% |
| 16 | CARM FP · CARMILA SA | 3.18% |
| 17 | BLND LN · BRITISH LAND CO PLC | 3.14% |
| 18 | MPACT SP · MAPLETREE PAN ASIA COMMERCIAL | 3.11% |
| 19 | MINT SP · MAPLETREE INDUSTRIAL TRUST | 3.07% |
| 20 | 8985 JP · JAPAN HOTEL REIT INVESTMENT CORPORATION | 3.03% |
| 21 | GFC FP · Gecina SA | 2.88% |
| 22 | 3309 JP · SEKISUI HOUSE REIT INC | 2.85% |
| 23 | 3471 JP · MITSUI FUDOSAN LOGISTICS PARK | 2.84% |
| 24 | FCT SP · FRASERS CENTREPOINT TRUST | 2.81% |
| 25 | DEI US · DOUGLAS EMMETT INC | 2.78% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00908 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | May 20, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 17, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +0.13% | -0.22% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.