TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00899 vs 00920
Franklin Templeton SinoAm Global Clean Energy ETF compared with Fubon Global ESG Green Energy ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00899 Franklin Templeton SinoAm Global Clean Energy ETF | 00920 Fubon Global ESG Green Energy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 21.32 | TWD 23.61 |
| Assets under management | TWD 339M | TWD 465M |
| Beneficiaries | 3,482 | 5,972 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.90% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.20% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00899 | 00920 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +4.87% | +29.30% |
| 3-year return | +27.74% | +80.18% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 23.74% | 28.06% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -29.38% | -19.58% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.26 | 1.13 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
10 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 28, 2026.
| Security | 00899 weight | 00920 weight |
|---|---|---|
| VWS · VWS DC | 4.47% | 4.61% |
| FSLR · FSLR US | 4.38% | 3.52% |
| BE · BE US | 3.37% | 9.07% |
| NXT · NXT US | 4.14% | 2.29% |
| EDP · EDP SA | 4.50% | 2.14% |
| VER · VERBUND AG | 4.93% | 1.83% |
| ORSTED · ORSTED AS | 4.53% | 1.51% |
| ENLT · ENLT IT | 4.83% | 1.24% |
| NDX1 · NORDEX SE | 4.73% | 0.87% |
| ENPH · ENPH US | 3.98% | 0.75% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00899 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | CWEN · CWEN US | 4.85% |
| 2 | MEL · MEL NZ | 4.77% |
| 3 | BEPC · BEPC CN | 4.56% |
| 4 | 9502 · 9502 JP | 4.53% |
| 5 | EDPR · EDPR PL | 4.52% |
| 6 | DORL · Doral Group Renewabl | 3.15% |
| 7 | SEDG · SEDG US | 2.74% |
| 8 | ICLN · ICLN US | 2.73% |
| 9 | PLUG · PLUG US | 2.71% |
| 10 | ENRG · Energix-Renewable En | 2.62% |
| 11 | 1735 · 1735 HK | 2.16% |
| 12 | 916 · 916 HK | 2.13% |
| 13 | NOFR · OY Nofar Energy Ltd | 1.92% |
| 14 | SLR · SLR SM | 1.82% |
| 15 | ERG · ERG IM | 1.75% |
| 16 | SHLS · SHLS US | 1.74% |
| 17 | SCATC · SCATC NO | 1.71% |
| 18 | REX · REX American Resourc | 1.51% |
| 19 | MSKE · Meshek Energy Renewa | 1.44% |
| 20 | 336260 · 336260 KS | 1.36% |
| 21 | GPRE · GPRE US | 1.31% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00899 | 00920 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | — | Fubon Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jan 21, 2022 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 27, 2026 | Oct 27, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 31 | 34 |
| Premium / discount | -0.33% | -0.17% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0089900920
Current market valueTWD 213.2K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00920 units9,030
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.