TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00893 vs 00919
Cathay Global Autonomous EV ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00893 Cathay Global Autonomous EV ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 43.07 | TWD 29.57 |
| Assets under management | TWD 14.3B | TWD 514.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 58,275 | 1,375,210 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 9.67% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.20% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00893 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +61.55% | +52.25% |
| 3-year return | +131.31% | +81.28% |
| 5-year return | +197.86% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 29.40% | 18.08% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -16.74% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 2.32 | 2.09 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00893 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMD US · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 22.70% |
| 2 | NVDA US · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 13.86% |
| 3 | TSLA US · TESLA INC. | 10.96% |
| 4 | TXN US · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 10.96% |
| 5 | 300750 CH · 300750 CH | 6.48% |
| 6 | ABBN SW · ABB Rg | 6.28% |
| 7 | EMR US · Emerson Electric Co | 3.75% |
| 8 | 2308 · 2308 | 3.43% |
| 9 | IFX GR · Infineon Technolo N | 3.12% |
| 10 | NXPI US · NXP SEMICONDUCTORS | 2.83% |
| 11 | 6752 JP · PANASONIC CORP. | 2.35% |
| 12 | 1211 HK · BYD CO LTD-H | 2.13% |
| 13 | BE US · Bloom Energy Corporation | 1.43% |
| 14 | 009150 KS · Samsung Electro-Mech Co | 1.22% |
| 15 | 175 HK · GEELY AUTOMOBILE HOLDING LTD | 0.71% |
| 16 | BWA US · BorgWarner Inc. | 0.64% |
| 17 | ALB US · Albemarle Corp | 0.62% |
| 18 | 006400 KS · Samsung SDI Co | 0.61% |
| 19 | RIVN US · Rivian Automotive Inc | 0.60% |
| 20 | 9868 HK · XPENG INC - CLASS A SHARES | 0.47% |
| 21 | 373220 KS · LG Energy Solution. Ltd. | 0.47% |
| 22 | 300014 CH · EVE Energy (A) | 0.44% |
| 23 | SWKS US · SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC | 0.43% |
| 24 | 2015 HK · LI AUTO INC-CLASS A | 0.42% |
| 25 | ALV US · Autoliv Inc. | 0.42% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00893 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 1, 2021 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 30 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | +1.48% | -0.03% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0089300919
Current market valueTWD 430.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units14,565
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 41.6K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.