TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00886 vs 00919
SinoPac US Tech Breakthrough ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00886 SinoPac US Tech Breakthrough ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 47.87 | TWD 31.96 |
| Assets under management | TWD 213M | TWD 609.3B |
| Beneficiaries | 1,182 | 1,419,036 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 10.70% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00886 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | +64.94% |
| 3-year return | — | +95.53% |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 24.29% | 18.58% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -6.77% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 4.27 | 2.6 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 18, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00886 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | PANW US · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 4.76% |
| 2 | MRK US · MRK US | 4.47% |
| 3 | MSFT US · MSFT US | 4.39% |
| 4 | AMD US · AMD US | 4.29% |
| 5 | META US · META US | 4.22% |
| 6 | INTC US · INTEL CORP | 4.03% |
| 7 | AAPL US · AAPL US | 4.02% |
| 8 | V US · V US | 3.98% |
| 9 | NVDA US · NVDA US | 3.93% |
| 10 | PLTR US · PLTR US | 3.92% |
| 11 | CRWD US · Crowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.80% |
| 12 | AMZN US · AMZN US | 3.75% |
| 13 | GOOGL US · GOOGL US | 3.46% |
| 14 | NFLX US · NFLX US | 3.19% |
| 15 | MA US · MA US | 2.98% |
| 16 | VRTX US · VRTX US | 2.56% |
| 17 | TXN US · TXN US | 2.37% |
| 18 | QCOM US · QCOM US | 2.01% |
| 19 | ORCL US · ORCL US | 1.96% |
| 20 | ADI US · ADI US | 1.78% |
| 21 | SNDK US · Sandisk Corp/DE | 1.78% |
| 22 | IBM US · IBM US | 1.70% |
| 23 | FTNT US · FTNT US | 1.65% |
| 24 | REGN US · Regeneron Pharmaceuticals In | 1.56% |
| 25 | CRM US · CRM US | 1.46% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00886 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | SinoPac Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Mar 31, 2021 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 17, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 103 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | -0.54% | -0.22% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0088600919
Current market valueTWD 478.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units14,978
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 51.2K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.