TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00877 vs 00878
Fuh Hwa China 5G Communication ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00877 Fuh Hwa China 5G Communication ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 25.32 | TWD 33.03 |
| Assets under management | TWD 4.7B | TWD 649.9B |
| Beneficiaries | 13,867 | 1,711,530 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 7.54% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00877 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +6.03% | +64.83% |
| 3-year return | +145.11% | +93.83% |
| 5-year return | +91.67% | +125.60% |
| 1-year volatility | 43.00% | 21.43% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -52.51% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.17 | 2.53 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Nov 5, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00877 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 002475 · 002475 CH | 9.83% |
| 2 | 300308 · 300308 CH | 7.49% |
| 3 | 601138 · 601138 CH | 6.66% |
| 4 | 603986 · 603986 CH | 6.66% |
| 5 | 300502 · 300502 CH | 6.30% |
| 6 | 002384 · 002384 CH | 4.33% |
| 7 | 600183 · 600183 CH | 4.29% |
| 8 | 002463 · 002463 CH | 4.13% |
| 9 | 000063 · 000063 CH | 3.52% |
| 10 | 600487 · 600487 CH | 3.27% |
| 11 | 300394 · 300394 CH | 3.21% |
| 12 | 000988 · 000988 CH | 2.53% |
| 13 | 688498 · 688498 CH | 2.47% |
| 14 | 002241 · 002241 CH | 2.34% |
| 15 | 002916 · 002916 CH | 2.23% |
| 16 | 000938 · 000938 CH | 2.17% |
| 17 | 002281 · 002281 CH | 1.78% |
| 18 | 300136 · 300136 CH | 1.66% |
| 19 | 002600 · 002600 CH | 1.65% |
| 20 | 300017 · 300017 CH | 1.55% |
| 21 | 002938 · 002938 CH | 1.33% |
| 22 | 600703 · 600703 CH | 1.26% |
| 23 | 603083 · 603083 CH | 1.22% |
| 24 | 603228 · 603228 CH | 1.11% |
| 25 | 300548 · 300548 CH | 1.02% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00877 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fuh Hwa Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 22, 2020 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Nov 5, 2026 | Nov 5, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Nov 5, 2026 | Nov 5, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 47 | 29 |
| Premium / discount | -0.59% | +0.24% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0087700878
Current market valueTWD 253.2K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units7,665
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 19.1K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.