TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00861 vs 00878
Yuanta Global NextGen Communications ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00861 Yuanta Global NextGen Communications ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 85.30 | TWD 32.43 |
| Assets under management | TWD 5.4B | TWD 566.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 19,737 | 1,617,951 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.80% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.90% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.23% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00861 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +91.51% | +62.99% |
| 3-year return | +163.03% | +73.79% |
| 5-year return | +190.14% | +120.65% |
| 1-year volatility | 28.26% | 20.51% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -18.92% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 3.39 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
4 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00861 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AAPL UQ · APPLE INC | 8.78% |
| 2 | CSCO UQ · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 8.77% |
| 3 | 005930 KP · SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD | 7.61% |
| 4 | 2330 · 2330 | 7.57% |
| 5 | AVGO UQ · BROADCOM INC | 7.47% |
| 6 | AMAT UQ · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 6.83% |
| 7 | LRCX UQ · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 6.22% |
| 8 | APH UN · AMPHENOL CORP-CL A | 3.64% |
| 9 | QCOM UQ · QUALCOMM INC | 3.28% |
| 10 | MRVL UQ · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC | 2.81% |
| 11 | 8035 JT · TOKYO ELECTRON LTD | 2.76% |
| 12 | EQIX UQ · EQUINIX INC | 1.95% |
| 13 | VZ UN · VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC | 1.88% |
| 14 | T UN · AT&T INC | 1.58% |
| 15 | 6981 JT · MURATA MANUFACTURING CO LTD | 1.45% |
| 16 | DLR UN · DIGITAL REALTY TRUST INC | 1.28% |
| 17 | TEL UN · TE CONNECTIVITY PLC | 1.20% |
| 18 | MPWR UQ · MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC | 1.16% |
| 19 | DTE GY · DEUTSCHE TELEKOM AG-REG | 1.03% |
| 20 | 9984 JT · SOFTBANK GROUP CORP | 1.02% |
| 21 | KEYS UN · KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES IN | 1.00% |
| 22 | NOKIA FH · NOKIA OYJ | 0.91% |
| 23 | TMUS UQ · T-MOBILE US INC | 0.83% |
| 24 | LITE UQ · LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | 0.82% |
| 25 | 5803 JT · FUJIKURA LTD | 0.80% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00861 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Yuanta Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Nov 19, 2019 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 29, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 49 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +1.02% | +0.53% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0086100878
Current market valueTWD 853K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units26,302
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 49.5K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.