TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00851 vs 00878
Taishin SG Global AI and Robotics Select ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00851 Taishin SG Global AI and Robotics Select ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 70.15 | TWD 34.23 |
| Assets under management | TWD 389M | TWD 641.2B |
| Beneficiaries | 2,127 | 1,665,885 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | 2.42% | 7.27% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.75% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.25% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00851 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +37.12% | +74.44% |
| 3-year return | +110.77% | +94.00% |
| 5-year return | +108.73% | +134.65% |
| 1-year volatility | 24.58% | 21.06% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -14.69% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.5 | 3.21 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
1 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 14, 2026.
| Security | 00851 weight | 00878 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 2454 · 2454 | 2.33% | 3.63% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00851 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 000660 KP · 000660 KP | 5.65% |
| 2 | AAPL UW · AAPL UW | 5.36% |
| 3 | META UW · META UW | 5.28% |
| 4 | 2330 · 2330 | 4.91% |
| 5 | AMZN UW · AMZN UW | 4.87% |
| 6 | MSFT US · Microsoft Corp | 4.86% |
| 7 | GOOGL UW · GOOGL UW | 4.82% |
| 8 | MU UW · MU UW | 4.72% |
| 9 | NVDA UW · NVDA UW | 4.72% |
| 10 | ASML NA · ASML NA | 4.71% |
| 11 | AVGO UW · Broadcom Inc | 4.55% |
| 12 | WMT UN · WMT UN | 4.49% |
| 13 | LRCX UW · LRCX UW | 2.98% |
| 14 | AMAT UW · AMAT UW | 2.80% |
| 15 | NFLX UW · NFLX UW | 2.50% |
| 16 | GE UN · GE UN | 2.48% |
| 17 | PLTR UW · PLTR UW | 2.37% |
| 18 | DELL UN · Dell Technologies Inc | 2.29% |
| 19 | ARM UW · ARM UW | 1.96% |
| 20 | ANET UN · ANET UN | 1.87% |
| 21 | KLAC UW · KLAC UW | 1.75% |
| 22 | 6857 JT · 6857 JT | 1.66% |
| 23 | QCOM UW · QCOM UW | 1.32% |
| 24 | ISRG UW · ISRG UW | 1.01% |
| 25 | APP UW · AppLovin Corp | 0.94% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00851 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Taishin Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Aug 12, 2019 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Sep 14, 2026 | Sep 14, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 11, 2026 | Sep 14, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 58 | 29 |
| Premium / discount | -1.25% | -0.35% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0085100878
Current market valueTWD 701.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units20,493
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 34K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.