TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00783 vs 00878
Fubon China CSI 500 Index ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00783 Fubon China CSI 500 Index ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 27.86 | TWD 32.43 |
| Assets under management | TWD 190M | TWD 566.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 817 | 1,617,951 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.80% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.99% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.10% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00783 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +39.51% | +62.99% |
| 3-year return | +34.65% | +73.79% |
| 5-year return | +23.66% | +120.65% |
| 1-year volatility | 22.67% | 20.51% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -16.47% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.83 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00783 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 300604 CH · 300604 CH | 1.62% |
| 2 | 688120 CH · 688120 CH | 1.03% |
| 3 | 688498 CH · 688498 CH | 1.03% |
| 4 | 688347 CH · 688347 CH | 0.93% |
| 5 | 688361 CH · 688361 CH | 0.82% |
| 6 | 300857 CH · 300857 CH | 0.77% |
| 7 | 002281 CH · 002281 CH | 0.73% |
| 8 | 002008 CH · 002008 CH | 0.66% |
| 9 | 600988 CH · 600988 CH | 0.62% |
| 10 | 300285 CH · 300285 CH | 0.61% |
| 11 | 001309 CH · 001309 CH | 0.59% |
| 12 | 688002 CH · 688002 CH | 0.58% |
| 13 | 300136 CH · 300136 CH | 0.54% |
| 14 | 300223 CH · 300223 CH | 0.53% |
| 15 | 688200 CH · 688200 CH | 0.51% |
| 16 | 300475 CH · 300475 CH | 0.50% |
| 17 | 300054 CH · 300054 CH | 0.50% |
| 18 | 688019 CH · 688019 CH | 0.49% |
| 19 | 688777 CH · 688777 CH | 0.49% |
| 20 | 002436 CH · 002436 CH | 0.47% |
| 21 | 688702 CH · 688702 CH | 0.46% |
| 22 | 688099 CH · 688099 CH | 0.46% |
| 23 | 300666 CH · 300666 CH | 0.45% |
| 24 | 300757 CH · 300757 CH | 0.45% |
| 25 | 300058 CH · 300058 CH | 0.43% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00783 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Mar 27, 2019 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 476 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | +1.09% | +0.53% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0078300878
Current market valueTWD 278.6K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units8,590
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 16.2K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.