TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00770 vs 00830

Cathay North American Technology ETF compared with Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap35.77%Low · 25 common securities
Higher 1-year return00830+26.74% vs +59.91%
Higher distribution yield0077016.00% vs 10.85%
Lower annual fee00830— vs 0.56%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00770-0.62%63.75 TWD・-0.40 TWD
00830+6.69%82.95 TWD・+5.20 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00770
Cathay North American Technology ETF
00830
Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF
Latest closeTWD 63.75TWD 82.95
Assets under managementTWD 6.2BTWD 77.5B
Beneficiaries21,952192,756
Trailing 12-month distribution yield16.00%10.85%
Total expense ratio——
Management fee—0.45%
Custody fee—0.11%

Performance and risk

Metric0077000830
1-year return+26.74%+59.91%
3-year return+139.90%+218.47%
5-year return+123.80%+233.02%
1-year volatility26.68%43.79%
1-year max drawdown-18.36%-24.60%
1-year Sharpe ratio0.431.13

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Common holdings

25 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 28, 2026.

Security00770 weight00830 weight
NVDA · NVIDIA CORPORATION8.19%11.91%
AVGO · BROADCOM INC7.14%9.30%
AMD · ADV MICRO DEVICES4.22%4.79%
MU · Micron Technology Inc4.02%7.79%
INTC · Intel Corp2.15%4.21%
AMAT · APPLIED MATERIALS INC1.45%3.47%
LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP1.39%3.21%
TXN · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC1.30%4.76%
MRVL · MARVELL TECH GROUP0.99%4.63%
ADI · ANALOG DEVICES INC0.96%4.73%
KLAC · K L A-TENCOR CORP0.93%3.52%
QCOM · QUALCOMM INC0.91%4.35%
NXPI · NXP SEMICONDUCTORS0.30%2.91%
MPWR · MONOLITHIC POWER SYS0.28%2.72%
TER · TERADYNE INC0.23%2.31%
COHR · COHERENT INC0.21%2.11%
ALAB · ASTERA LABS INC0.21%2.25%
MCHP · MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INC0.20%1.99%
ON · ON SEMICONDUCTOR0.14%1.40%
CRDO · CREDO TECHNOLOGY GROUP HOLDI0.13%1.42%
Q · Q US0.11%1.13%
ENTG · ENTEGRIS INC0.11%1.05%
MTSI · MACOM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS H0.08%0.88%
LSCC · LATTICE SEMICOND0.07%0.61%
SITM · SITIME CORP0.05%0.61%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00770 weight
1AAPL · Apple Inc.9.25%
2MSFT · Microsoft Corp9.09%
3GOOGL · ALPHABET CL A CMN4.52%
4META · META US4.22%
5GOOG · ALPHABET INC-CL C3.62%
6PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A2.11%
7CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc2.03%
8PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc1.51%
9CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HLD CM A1.26%
10IBM · Intl Business Machines Corp1.09%
11ORCL · ORACLE CORP1.04%
12SHOP · SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A0.93%
13CRM · SALESFORCE.COM INC0.91%
14ANET · ARISTA NETWORKS INC0.90%
15APH · AMPHENOL CORP-CL A0.89%
16SNDK · Sandisk Corp/DE0.88%
17NOW · SERVICENOW, INC.0.74%
18DELL · DELL TECHNOLOGIES -C0.70%
19STX · SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY0.70%
20ACN · ACCENTURE PLC-CL A0.66%
21WDC · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP0.63%
22SNOW · SNOWFLAKE INC-CLASS A0.54%
23FTNT · FORTINET INC0.53%
24NET · CLOUDFLARE, INC.0.49%
25GLW · CORNING INC0.46%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric0077000830
IssuerCathay Securities Investment TrustCathay Securities Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark——
Listing dateJan 29, 2019May 3, 2019
Latest market dateOct 29, 2026Oct 29, 2026
Holdings dateOct 27, 2026Oct 27, 2026
Eligible stock positions27830
Premium / discount-1.32%-1.23%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

0077000830
Current market valueTWD 637.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00830 units7,685
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD -32.8K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.