TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00737 vs 00919
Cathay Nasdaq CTA Artificial Inteligence and Robotics ETF compared with CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00737 Cathay Nasdaq CTA Artificial Inteligence and Robotics ETF | 00919 CAPITAL TIP CUSTOMIZED TAIWAN SELECT HIGH DIVIDEND EXCHANGE TRADED FUND |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 40.51 | TWD 32.59 |
| Assets under management | TWD 981M | TWD 636.7B |
| Beneficiaries | 5,396 | 1,500,550 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 10.49% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.85% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.25% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00737 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +8.26% | +66.10% |
| 3-year return | +54.03% | +102.45% |
| 5-year return | +20.35% | — |
| 1-year volatility | 22.41% | 18.61% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -17.54% | -10.49% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.35 | 2.86 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00737 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | ILMN · ILLUMINA, INC. | 2.04% |
| 2 | OCDO · Ocado Group Rg | 2.01% |
| 3 | RXRX · RXRX.OQ | 1.93% |
| 4 | TEM · TEMPUS AI INC | 1.84% |
| 5 | APPN · APPIAN CORP CL A CMN | 1.83% |
| 6 | ISRG · INTUITIVE SURG, INC. | 1.78% |
| 7 | S · SENTINELONE, INC. | 1.75% |
| 8 | DT · DYNATRACE, INC. | 1.74% |
| 9 | AI · C3.AI, INC. | 1.72% |
| 10 | SNPS · SYNOPSYS, INC. | 1.66% |
| 11 | IBM · Intl Business Machines Corp | 1.64% |
| 12 | NICE · NICE LTD ADS | 1.63% |
| 13 | META · META US | 1.62% |
| 14 | PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 1.60% |
| 15 | HEXAB · Hexagon -B- | 1.59% |
| 16 | NET · CLOUDFLARE, INC. | 1.58% |
| 17 | PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 1.56% |
| 18 | QQ/ · QinetiQ Group Rg | 1.54% |
| 19 | NOW · SERVICENOW, INC. | 1.54% |
| 20 | CDNS · CADENCE DESIGN SYS | 1.53% |
| 21 | CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc | 1.51% |
| 22 | 6954 · FANUC CORP. | 1.50% |
| 23 | DSY · Dassault Systemes P | 1.49% |
| 24 | SYM · SYMBOTIC INC | 1.48% |
| 25 | PEGA · PEGASYSTEMS INC | 1.45% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00737 | 00919 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Capital Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 11, 2018 | Oct 20, 2022 |
| Latest market date | Oct 30, 2026 | Oct 30, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 28, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 111 | 40 |
| Premium / discount | -1.77% | -0.18% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0073700919
Current market valueTWD 405.1K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00919 units12,430
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 42.5K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.