TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00737 vs 00830
Cathay Nasdaq CTA Artificial Inteligence and Robotics ETF compared with Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00737 Cathay Nasdaq CTA Artificial Inteligence and Robotics ETF | 00830 Cathay U.S. PHLX Semiconductor Sector ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 41.37 | TWD 82.95 |
| Assets under management | TWD 931M | TWD 77.5B |
| Beneficiaries | 5,396 | 192,756 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 10.85% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.85% | 0.45% |
| Custody fee | 0.25% | 0.11% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00737 | 00830 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +10.79% | +59.91% |
| 3-year return | +56.59% | +218.47% |
| 5-year return | +22.91% | +233.02% |
| 1-year volatility | 22.35% | 43.79% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -17.54% | -24.60% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.46 | 1.13 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
12 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 28, 2026.
| Security | 00737 weight | 00830 weight |
|---|---|---|
| AMD · ADV MICRO DEVICES | 0.84% | 4.79% |
| MRVL · MARVELL TECH GROUP | 0.82% | 4.63% |
| NXPI · NXP SEMICONDUCTORS | 0.80% | 2.91% |
| QCOM · QUALCOMM INC | 0.76% | 4.35% |
| TSM · TAIWAN SEMICOND ADS | 0.75% | 4.23% |
| NVDA · NVIDIA CORPORATION | 0.70% | 11.91% |
| MU · Micron Technology Inc | 0.69% | 7.79% |
| AVGO · BROADCOM INC | 0.66% | 9.30% |
| TER · TERADYNE INC | 0.65% | 2.31% |
| KLAC · K L A-TENCOR CORP | 0.62% | 3.52% |
| LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 0.56% | 3.21% |
| INTC · Intel Corp | 0.42% | 4.21% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00737 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | OCDO · Ocado Group Rg | 2.09% |
| 2 | ILMN · ILLUMINA, INC. | 1.99% |
| 3 | RXRX · RXRX.OQ | 1.81% |
| 4 | ISRG · INTUITIVE SURG, INC. | 1.80% |
| 5 | DT · DYNATRACE, INC. | 1.78% |
| 6 | APPN · APPIAN CORP CL A CMN | 1.77% |
| 7 | S · SENTINELONE, INC. | 1.76% |
| 8 | TEM · TEMPUS AI INC | 1.74% |
| 9 | AI · C3.AI, INC. | 1.73% |
| 10 | NICE · NICE LTD ADS | 1.69% |
| 11 | META · META US | 1.66% |
| 12 | SNPS · SYNOPSYS, INC. | 1.65% |
| 13 | NET · CLOUDFLARE, INC. | 1.63% |
| 14 | IBM · Intl Business Machines Corp | 1.63% |
| 15 | PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 1.62% |
| 16 | HEXAB · Hexagon -B- | 1.60% |
| 17 | NOW · SERVICENOW, INC. | 1.60% |
| 18 | PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 1.60% |
| 19 | DSY · Dassault Systemes P | 1.58% |
| 20 | CDNS · CADENCE DESIGN SYS | 1.55% |
| 21 | QQ/ · QinetiQ Group Rg | 1.54% |
| 22 | CSCO · Cisco Systems Inc | 1.53% |
| 23 | SYM · SYMBOTIC INC | 1.49% |
| 24 | 6954 · FANUC CORP. | 1.48% |
| 25 | PEGA · PEGASYSTEMS INC | 1.46% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00737 | 00830 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Cathay Securities Investment Trust | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 11, 2018 | May 3, 2019 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 27, 2026 | Oct 27, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 111 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | -0.86% | -1.23% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0073700830
Current market valueTWD 413.7K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00830 units4,987
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 44.9K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.