TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00700 vs 00878
Fubon Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00700 Fubon Hang Seng China Enterprises ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 17.99 | TWD 32.43 |
| Assets under management | TWD 638M | TWD 566.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 2,692 | 1,617,951 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 5.80% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.50% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.18% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00700 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +4.05% | +62.99% |
| 3-year return | +29.89% | +73.79% |
| 5-year return | +9.03% | +120.65% |
| 1-year volatility | 20.15% | 20.51% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -21.70% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 0.13 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 30, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00700 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 939 HK · 939 HK | 8.11% |
| 2 | 700 HK · 700 HK | 7.97% |
| 3 | 9988 HK · 9988 HK | 6.94% |
| 4 | 1398 HK · 1398 HK | 5.68% |
| 5 | 1810 HK · 1810 HK | 5.08% |
| 6 | 3690 HK · 3690 HK | 4.64% |
| 7 | 3988 HK · 3988 HK | 3.55% |
| 8 | 2318 HK · 2318 HK | 3.54% |
| 9 | 1211 HK · 1211 HK | 3.15% |
| 10 | 9999 HK · 9999 HK | 2.95% |
| 11 | 6160 HK · 6160 HK | 2.14% |
| 12 | 2628 HK · 2628 HK | 1.93% |
| 13 | 857 HK · 857 HK | 1.93% |
| 14 | 9618 HK · 9618 HK | 1.85% |
| 15 | 3968 HK · 3968 HK | 1.80% |
| 16 | 2899 HK · ZIJIN MINING GROUP CO LTD - H | 1.77% |
| 17 | 1288 HK · 1288 HK | 1.71% |
| 18 | 9888 HK · 9888 HK | 1.39% |
| 19 | 992 HK · 992 HK | 1.33% |
| 20 | 1801 HK · 1801 HK | 1.31% |
| 21 | 1088 HK · 1088 HK | 1.26% |
| 22 | 175 HK · 175 HK | 1.20% |
| 23 | 1024 HK · 1024 HK | 1.18% |
| 24 | 9987 HK · 9987 HK | 1.16% |
| 25 | 9992 HK · 9992 HK | 1.08% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00700 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jul 28, 2017 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Jul 31, 2026 | Jul 31, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Jul 30, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 46 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | -0.55% | +0.53% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0070000878
Current market valueTWD 179.9K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units5,547
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 10.4K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.