TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00662 vs 009824

Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap60.35%Moderate · 50 common securities
Higher 1-year return00662+502.93% vs —
Higher distribution yield—— vs —
Lower annual fee006620.51% vs 0.92%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00662+7.34%24.72 TWD・+1.69 TWD
009824+6.92%10.35 TWD・+0.67 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00662
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF
009824
CAPITAL US TECH GIANT EXCHANGE TRADED FUND
Latest closeTWD 123.60TWD 10.35
Assets under managementTWD 119BTWD 4.7B
Beneficiaries118,18642,339
Trailing 12-month distribution yield——
Total expense ratio——
Management fee0.30%0.80%
Custody fee0.21%0.12%

Performance and risk

Metric00662009824
1-year return+502.93%—
3-year return+939.53%—
5-year return+1,005.55%—
1-year volatility18.64%19.73%
1-year max drawdown-9.12%-7.93%
1-year Sharpe ratio1.230.27

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Common holdings

50 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 28, 2026.

Security00662 weight009824 weight
NVDA · NVDA US8.07%19.44%
AAPL · AAPL US7.79%21.59%
MSFT · MSFT US6.06%7.17%
MU · MU US4.45%7.33%
AMZN · AMZN US4.20%3.29%
GOOGL · ALPHABET INC-CL A2.89%3.24%
AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES3.88%2.76%
TSLA · TSLA US3.29%2.57%
AVGO · AVGO US2.50%6.59%
META · META US2.83%1.94%
PLTR · PLTR US1.94%3.10%
CSCO · CISCO SYSTEMS INC1.86%1.45%
AMAT · AMAT US1.33%1.76%
LRCX · LRCX US1.28%2.59%
TXN · TXN US1.20%1.40%
CRWD · CRWD US1.16%1.35%
INTC · INTC US2.09%0.95%
KLAC · KLA CORP0.85%1.15%
SNDK · SNDK US0.81%1.40%
STX · STX US0.64%1.59%
WDC · WESTERN DIGITAL CORP0.58%0.83%
FTNT · FTNT US0.58%1.02%
PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC1.39%0.50%
MRVL · Marvell Technology Inc0.91%0.46%
NFLX · NFLX US1.10%0.44%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00662 weight
1SPCX · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES2.70%
2GOOG · Alphabet Inc-CL C2.69%
3WMT · WALMART INC2.46%
4COST · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP1.87%
5AMGN · AMGEN INC1.03%
6LIN · LINDE PLC0.99%
7SHOP · SHOPIFY INC0.85%
8GILD · GILEAD SCIENCES INC0.84%
9PEP · PEPSICO INC0.77%
10ISRG · INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC0.67%
11TMUS · T-MOBILE US INC0.67%
12ASML · ASML Holding NV0.65%
13VRTX · VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.56%
14SBUX · STARBUCKS CORP0.50%
15BKNG · BOOKING HOLDINGS INC0.48%
16MAR · MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC/MD0.43%
17ARM · ARM HOLDINGS PLC0.42%
18CSX · CSX CORP0.41%
19CEG · CONSTELLATION ENERGY GROUP0.39%
20MNST · MONSTER BEVERAGE CORP0.38%
21MRNA · MODERNA INC0.35%
22REGN · REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS INC0.35%
23MDLZ · MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC0.34%
24LITE · LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC0.33%
25CMCSA · COMCAST CORP0.33%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00662009824
IssuerFubon Asset ManagementCapital Investment Trust
Tracking index / benchmark——
Listing dateJun 17, 2016Jun 25, 2026
Latest market dateOct 29, 2026Oct 29, 2026
Holdings dateOct 27, 2026Oct 27, 2026
Eligible stock positions10151
Premium / discount-0.56%+0.29%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00662009824
Current market valueTWD 1.2M
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009824 units119,420
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.