TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00662 vs 00878
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00662 Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF | 00878 Cathay MSCI Taiwan ESG Sustainability High Dividend Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 120.50 | TWD 34.83 |
| Assets under management | TWD 108.6B | TWD 653.7B |
| Beneficiaries | 109,655 | 1,665,885 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 7.15% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | 0.30% |
| Custody fee | 0.21% | 0.04% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00662 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +533.88% | +75.62% |
| 3-year return | +877.29% | +102.92% |
| 5-year return | +988.53% | +137.16% |
| 1-year volatility | 18.69% | 21.07% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.12% | -9.88% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.57 | 3.22 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
0 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Sep 18, 2026.
No data is currently available.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00662 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | NVDA US · NVIDIA CORP | 8.37% |
| 2 | AAPL US · APPLE INC | 7.81% |
| 3 | MSFT US · MICROSOFT CORP | 5.83% |
| 4 | MU US · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.80% |
| 5 | AMZN US · AMAZON.COM INC | 4.26% |
| 6 | AMD US · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.87% |
| 7 | META US · META PLATFORMS INC | 3.19% |
| 8 | GOOGL US · Alphabet Inc-CL A | 3.19% |
| 9 | GOOG US · Alphabet Inc-CL C | 2.96% |
| 10 | TSLA US · TESLA INC | 2.89% |
| 11 | AVGO US · BROADCOM INC | 2.60% |
| 12 | INTC US · INTEL CORP | 2.38% |
| 13 | WMT US · WALMART INC | 2.27% |
| 14 | CSCO US · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.89% |
| 15 | PLTR US · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.76% |
| 16 | COST US · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 1.73% |
| 17 | LRCX US · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.47% |
| 18 | AMAT US · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.44% |
| 19 | NFLX US · NETFLIX INC | 1.38% |
| 20 | PANW US · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.33% |
| 21 | SPCX US · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES | 1.29% |
| 22 | CRWD US · CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 1.09% |
| 23 | SNDK US · SANDISK CORP/DE | 1.04% |
| 24 | TXN US · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.02% |
| 25 | KLAC US · KLA CORP | 0.96% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00662 | 00878 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Cathay Securities Investment Trust |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 17, 2016 | Jul 20, 2020 |
| Latest market date | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Sep 17, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 101 | 29 |
| Premium / discount | +0.27% | -0.34% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0066200878
Current market valueTWD 1.2M
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00878 units34,596
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 86.2K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.