TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00662 vs 00757
Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF compared with UPAMC NYSE FANG+ ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00662 Fubon NASDAQ-100 ETF | 00757 UPAMC NYSE FANG+ ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 123.60 | TWD 140.40 |
| Assets under management | TWD 119B | TWD 37.6B |
| Beneficiaries | 118,186 | 68,189 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 0.30% | 0.85% |
| Custody fee | 0.21% | 0.18% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00662 | 00757 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | +502.93% | +12.82% |
| 3-year return | +939.53% | +149.60% |
| 5-year return | +1,005.55% | +166.41% |
| 1-year volatility | 18.64% | 23.62% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -9.12% | -19.31% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.23 | 0.67 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
10 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.
| Security | 00662 weight | 00757 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVIDIA CORP | 7.94% | 9.46% |
| AAPL · APPLE INC | 7.67% | 9.71% |
| MSFT · MICROSOFT CORP | 6.03% | 10.17% |
| MU · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.69% | 9.97% |
| AMZN · AMAZON.COM INC | 4.20% | 9.72% |
| GOOGL · Alphabet Inc-CL A | 2.91% | 8.90% |
| META · META PLATFORMS INC | 2.78% | 8.54% |
| AVGO · BROADCOM INC | 2.56% | 9.73% |
| PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.91% | 10.60% |
| NFLX · NETFLIX INC | 1.09% | 7.62% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00662 weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | AMD · ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.99% |
| 2 | TSLA · TESLA INC | 3.25% |
| 3 | GOOG · Alphabet Inc-CL C | 2.72% |
| 4 | SPCX · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES | 2.63% |
| 5 | WMT · WALMART INC | 2.44% |
| 6 | INTC · INTEL CORP | 2.12% |
| 7 | COST · COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP | 1.84% |
| 8 | CSCO · CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.83% |
| 9 | AMAT · APPLIED MATERIALS INC | 1.39% |
| 10 | PANW · PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC | 1.36% |
| 11 | LRCX · LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.34% |
| 12 | TXN · TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC | 1.19% |
| 13 | CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC | 1.15% |
| 14 | AMGN · AMGEN INC | 1.03% |
| 15 | LIN · LINDE PLC | 0.99% |
| 16 | MRVL · MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP LTD | 0.93% |
| 17 | ADI · ANALOG DEVICES INC | 0.88% |
| 18 | KLAC · KLA CORP | 0.88% |
| 19 | SNDK · SANDISK CORP/DE | 0.87% |
| 20 | SHOP · SHOPIFY INC | 0.86% |
| 21 | GILD · GILEAD SCIENCES INC | 0.83% |
| 22 | QCOM · QUALCOMM INC | 0.81% |
| 23 | PEP · PEPSICO INC | 0.76% |
| 24 | TMUS · T-MOBILE US INC | 0.67% |
| 25 | STX · SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PL | 0.67% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00662 | 00757 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Fubon Asset Management | Uni-President Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | NYSE FANG+ Index |
| Listing date | Jun 17, 2016 | Dec 6, 2018 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 28, 2026 | Oct 28, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 101 | 10 |
| Premium / discount | -0.56% | +0.56% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
0066200757
Current market valueTWD 1.2M
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00757 units8,803
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.