TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

006208 vs 00981A

Fubon FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 ETF compared with UPAMC Taiwan Growth Active ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap28.60%Low · 24 common securities
Higher 1-year return00981A+104.06% vs +125.10%
Higher distribution yield00981A3.48% vs 3.98%
Lower annual fee0062080.18% vs —

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

006208+7.37%235.35 TWD・+16.15 TWD
00981A-11.81%26.13 TWD・-3.50 TWD

Key metrics

Metric006208
Fubon FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 ETF
00981A
UPAMC Taiwan Growth Active ETF
Latest closeTWD 235.35TWD 26.13
Assets under managementTWD 396.7BTWD 244B
Beneficiaries711,711996,982
Trailing 12-month distribution yield3.48%3.98%
Total expense ratio
Management fee0.15%1.00%
Custody fee0.03%

Performance and risk

Metric00620800981A
1-year return+104.06%+125.10%
3-year return+230.10%
5-year return+222.29%
1-year volatility29.36%39.76%
1-year max drawdown-16.86%-26.35%
1-year Sharpe ratio3.453.19

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector00620800981A
Semiconductors
71.20%
30.95%
Electronic Components
8.04%
31.81%
Computers & Peripherals
3.91%
10.19%
Financials
8.31%
0.00%
Other Electronics
4.30%
3.99%
Communications & Networking
1.96%
4.98%
Plastics
0.80%
0.00%
Optoelectronics
0.39%
0.16%
Food
0.37%
0.00%
Electrical Machinery
0.00%
0.24%
Transportation
0.23%
0.00%
Utilities & Energy
0.08%
0.00%

Common holdings

24 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Jul 31, 2026.

Security006208 weight00981A weight
2330 · 233060.56%9.04%
2454 · 24545.32%6.42%
2308 · 23083.24%3.38%
3711 · 37111.87%3.15%
2303 · 23031.44%3.69%
2383 · 23831.40%7.77%
2345 · 23451.07%4.74%
3037 · 30371.06%4.87%
2327 · 23270.80%4.43%
3017 · 30170.76%4.56%
6669 · 66690.57%4.80%
3665 · 36650.38%3.74%
3653 · 36530.30%2.84%
2368 · 23680.28%2.09%
2449 · 24490.26%0.59%
2360 · 23600.79%0.25%
4958 · 49580.32%0.24%
8046 · 80460.20%3.04%
2408 · 24080.42%0.12%
2317 · 23173.13%0.00%
2382 · 23820.79%0.00%
3008 · 30080.39%0.00%
3443 · 34430.31%0.00%
3661 · 36610.25%0.00%

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security006208 weight
12891 · 28911.17%
22881 · 28811.11%
32882 · 28820.99%
42887 · 28870.86%
51303 · 13030.80%
62885 · 28850.77%
72886 · 28860.64%
82884 · 28840.60%
92357 · 23570.56%
102890 · 28900.54%
112412 · 24120.54%
123231 · 32310.54%
132883 · 28830.50%
142059 · 20590.44%
152301 · 23010.42%
162892 · 28920.42%
172880 · 28800.41%
182344 · 23440.41%
191216 · 12160.37%
207769 · 77690.36%
215880 · 58800.30%
222395 · 23950.27%
232603 · 26030.23%
244904 · 49040.19%
253045 · 30450.16%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00620800981A
IssuerFubon Asset ManagementUni-President Asset Management
Tracking index / benchmarkFTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Index
Listing dateJul 17, 2012May 27, 2025
Latest market dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Holdings dateJul 31, 2026Jul 31, 2026
Eligible stock positions5051
Premium / discount+0.96%+1.04%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00620800981A
Current market valueTWD 2.4M
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 00981A units90,068
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 11.8K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.