TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00411A vs 006208
UPAMC Global Frontier Technology Active ETF compared with Fubon FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00411A UPAMC Global Frontier Technology Active ETF | 006208 Fubon FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 10.15 | TWD 250.35 |
| Assets under management | TWD 4.5B | TWD 464.7B |
| Beneficiaries | 20,346 | 712,143 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | 3.27% |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | — | 0.15% |
| Custody fee | — | 0.03% |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00411A | 006208 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | +75.47% |
| 3-year return | — | +259.51% |
| 5-year return | — | +241.23% |
| 1-year volatility | 30.72% | 29.09% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -10.06% | -16.86% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | 1.48 | 2.72 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Sector allocation
Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.
Common holdings
4 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00411A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPCX · SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A | 8.28% |
| 2 | BE · BLOOM ENERGY CORP- A | 8.11% |
| 3 | NVDA · NVDA US | 7.91% |
| 4 | PLTR · PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A | 7.45% |
| 5 | 8996 · 8996 | 5.91% |
| 6 | AMD · AMD US | 5.39% |
| 7 | CRWD · CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC - A | 5.12% |
| 8 | LITE · LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC | 4.21% |
| 9 | NET · CLOUDFLARE INC - CLASS A | 3.83% |
| 10 | ANET · ARISTA NETWORKS INC.anet us | 3.39% |
| 11 | NTSK · NETSKOPE INC-CL A | 3.12% |
| 12 | SNOW · SNOW US | 2.85% |
| 13 | 581A · GO INC | 2.84% |
| 14 | GOOGL · GOOGL US | 2.68% |
| 15 | 4062 · IBIDEN CO LTD | 2.09% |
| 16 | MSFT · MSFT US | 2.07% |
| 17 | NBIS · NEBIUS GROUP NV | 1.99% |
| 18 | MU · MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 1.45% |
| 19 | TSLA · TSLA US | 1.05% |
| 20 | TWST · TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP | 0.49% |
| 21 | ZS · ZSCALER INC | 0.49% |
| 22 | AMZN · AMZN US | 0.39% |
| 23 | DELL · DELL INC | 0.38% |
| 24 | IONQ · IONQ INC | 0.31% |
| 25 | RKLB · ROCKET LAB USA INC | 0.28% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00411A | 006208 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Uni-President Asset Management | Fubon Asset Management |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Index |
| Listing date | Aug 26, 2026 | Jul 17, 2012 |
| Latest market date | Oct 16, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 15, 2026 | Oct 16, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 32 | 50 |
| Premium / discount | +0.50% | +0.61% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00411A006208
Current market valueTWD 101.5K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 006208 units405
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 3.3K
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.