TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON

00403A vs 006208

UPAMC Taiwan Elite 50 Active ETF compared with Fubon FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 ETF.

Four ways to read this comparison

Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.

Portfolio overlap35.39%Low · 27 common securities
Higher 1-year return006208— vs +64.98%
Higher distribution yield006208— vs 3.41%
Lower annual fee0062081.04% vs 0.18%

Price and return trend

Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.

00403A+14.05%9.66 TWD・+1.19 TWD
006208+12.29%240.75 TWD・+26.35 TWD

Key metrics

Metric00403A
UPAMC Taiwan Elite 50 Active ETF
006208
Fubon FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 ETF
Latest closeTWD 9.66TWD 240.75
Assets under managementTWD 128.5BTWD 464B
Beneficiaries784,963718,740
Trailing 12-month distribution yield—3.41%
Total expense ratio——
Management fee1.00%0.15%
Custody fee0.04%0.03%

Performance and risk

Metric00403A006208
1-year return—+64.98%
3-year return—+257.88%
5-year return—+229.82%
1-year volatility39.76%29.11%
1-year max drawdown-25.66%-16.86%
1-year Sharpe ratio-0.542.19

Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.

Sector allocation

Weights are based on the latest available disclosed portfolios.

Sector00403A006208
Semiconductors
36.34%
68.78%
Electronic Components
29.93%
8.48%
Computers & Peripherals
8.91%
4.29%
Financials
0.48%
9.27%
Other Electronics
2.56%
3.92%
Communications & Networking
2.69%
1.80%
Plastics
2.91%
1.49%
Electrical Machinery
2.64%
0.00%
Optoelectronics
1.70%
0.53%
Food
0.00%
0.38%
Biotechnology & Healthcare
0.00%
0.38%
Transportation
0.00%
0.27%

Common holdings

27 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.

Security00403A weight006208 weight
2330 · 233014.48%57.23%
2454 · 24544.82%5.77%
2308 · 23082.76%2.77%
1303 · 13032.91%1.49%
2383 · 23834.68%1.41%
3037 · 30375.83%1.33%
3017 · 30175.63%0.96%
2345 · 23452.19%0.84%
2327 · 23273.72%0.83%
3711 · 37110.69%2.19%
2317 · 23170.62%2.93%
2408 · 24081.04%0.60%
3443 · 34434.22%0.59%
6669 · 66692.72%0.57%
3653 · 36534.99%0.54%
3008 · 30081.70%0.53%
2059 · 20590.69%0.53%
2368 · 23680.81%0.38%
2882 · 28820.36%1.08%
8046 · 80462.93%0.30%
2449 · 24490.84%0.30%
3665 · 36651.94%0.30%
2883 · 28830.12%0.59%
2301 · 23010.06%0.48%
2303 · 23030.00%1.30%

Showing the 25 largest common positions by minimum portfolio weight.

Holdings unique to each ETF

These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.

#Security00403A weight
16223 · 62233.50%
23189 · 31893.32%
36274 · 62742.60%
45274 · 52742.39%
58996 · 89962.26%
66805 · 68050.59%
73450 · 34500.51%
83211 · 32110.50%
91560 · 15600.38%
106442 · 64420.36%
112313 · 23130.33%
123583 · 35830.30%
136488 · 64880.19%
142455 · 24550.08%
156285 · 62850.06%
161717 · 17170.05%
172481 · 24810.04%

Fund profile and disclosure dates

Metric00403A006208
IssuerUni-President Asset ManagementFubon Asset Management
Tracking index / benchmark—FTSE TWSE Taiwan 50 Index
Listing dateMay 12, 2026Jul 17, 2012
Latest market dateOct 30, 2026Oct 30, 2026
Holdings dateOct 29, 2026Oct 29, 2026
Eligible stock positions5050
Premium / discount+0.31%+0.38%

Switching estimate

Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.

00403A006208
Current market valueTWD 96.6K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 006208 units401
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 3.3K

This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.

Continue researching this pair

Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.

Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ

What does portfolio overlap measure?

For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.

Are historical returns shown with distributions?

Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.

Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?

No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.

How to use this comparison

Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.