TAIWAN ETF COMPARISON
00402A vs 009815
Allianz Global Investors US Technology Equity Active ETF compared with United Magnificent 7 Plus US Big Tech ETF.
Four ways to read this comparison
Portfolio similarity, historical return, distribution yield and annual fund cost answer different questions.
Price and return trend
Normalized returns make funds with different unit prices comparable. Switch to price mode to view actual TWD prices.
Key metrics
| Metric | 00402A Allianz Global Investors US Technology Equity Active ETF | 009815 United Magnificent 7 Plus US Big Tech ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Latest close | TWD 9.71 | TWD 11.91 |
| Assets under management | TWD 5.5B | TWD 5B |
| Beneficiaries | 37,907 | 28,896 |
| Trailing 12-month distribution yield | — | — |
| Total expense ratio | — | — |
| Management fee | 1.00% | — |
| Custody fee | 0.15% | — |
Performance and risk
| Metric | 00402A | 009815 |
|---|---|---|
| 1-year return | — | — |
| 3-year return | — | — |
| 5-year return | — | — |
| 1-year volatility | 26.30% | 20.33% |
| 1-year max drawdown | -11.44% | -8.69% |
| 1-year Sharpe ratio | -0.29 | 2.66 |
Returns are price returns. Risk statistics use the available one-year price history and are shown only when sufficient observations exist.
Common holdings
21 securities appear in both disclosed portfolios. Data updated Oct 29, 2026.
| Security | 00402A weight | 009815 weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA · NVDA US | 8.73% | 14.95% |
| AAPL · AAPL US | 8.11% | 14.73% |
| MSFT · MSFT US | 5.48% | 11.63% |
| AMZN · AMZN US | 4.41% | 7.36% |
| META · META US | 3.35% | 4.35% |
| GOOGL · GOOGL US | 3.23% | 9.95% |
| MU · MU US | 5.78% | 2.94% |
| AMD · AMD US | 5.98% | 2.55% |
| AVGO · AVGO US | 2.21% | 4.49% |
| TSM · TSM US | 1.55% | 5.85% |
| PLTR · PLTR US | 2.24% | 1.24% |
| ASML · ASML US | 1.16% | 1.74% |
| INTC · INTC US | 1.46% | 1.08% |
| PANW · Palo Alto Networks Inc | 3.15% | 0.91% |
| LRCX · LRCX US | 2.09% | 0.84% |
| TXN · TXN US | 2.68% | 0.79% |
| CRWD · CRWD US | 1.92% | 0.74% |
| NFLX · NFLX US | 0.89% | 0.73% |
| ADI · ADI US | 2.09% | 0.58% |
| KLAC · KLAC US | 1.28% | 0.56% |
| BKNG · BKNG US | 0.50% | 0.32% |
Holdings unique to each ETF
These securities appear in one disclosed portfolio but not the other.
| # | Security | 00402A weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GOOG · Alphabet Inc | 3.21% |
| 2 | WDC · Western Digital Corp | 1.90% |
| 3 | LITE · Lumentum Holdings Inc | 1.75% |
| 4 | MRVL · Marvell Technology Inc | 1.68% |
| 5 | CDNS · Cadence Design Systems Inc | 1.59% |
| 6 | MCHP · Microchip Technology Inc | 1.45% |
| 7 | SNOW · Snowflake Inc | 1.38% |
| 8 | V · Visa Inc | 1.24% |
| 9 | NOW · ServiceNow Inc | 1.22% |
| 10 | SHOP · Shopify Inc | 1.19% |
| 11 | CIEN · Ciena Corp | 1.15% |
| 12 | COHR · Coherent Corp | 1.15% |
| 13 | CLS · Celestica Inc | 1.12% |
| 14 | STX · Seagate Technology Holdings PLC | 1.03% |
| 15 | ANET · Arista Networks Inc | 0.81% |
| 16 | ARM · ARM Holdings PLC | 0.81% |
| 17 | SKHY · SK hynix Inc | 0.79% |
| 18 | SPCX · Space Exploration Technologies Corp | 0.75% |
| 19 | TER · Teradyne Inc | 0.73% |
| 20 | AXON · Axon Enterprise Inc | 0.61% |
| 21 | TTWO · Take-Two Interactive Software Inc | 0.59% |
| 22 | IOT · Samsara Inc | 0.58% |
| 23 | BABA · Alibaba Group Holding Ltd | 0.46% |
| 24 | SIMO · Silicon Motion Technology Corp | 0.46% |
| 25 | MDB · MongoDB Inc | 0.42% |
Fund profile and disclosure dates
| Metric | 00402A | 009815 |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Allianz Global Investors Taiwan | — |
| Tracking index / benchmark | — | — |
| Listing date | Jun 9, 2026 | Jan 26, 2026 |
| Latest market date | Oct 29, 2026 | Oct 29, 2026 |
| Holdings date | Oct 27, 2026 | Oct 27, 2026 |
| Eligible stock positions | 49 | 30 |
| Premium / discount | -1.52% | -0.83% |
Switching estimate
Estimate how many units of the other ETF the current market value could purchase.
00402A009815
Current market valueTWD 97.1K
Unrealized gain / lossTWD 0
Estimated 009815 units8,152
Estimated annual distribution changeTWD 0
This estimate excludes brokerage fees, taxes, bid-ask spreads and intraday price movement.
Continue researching this pair
Review each ETF independently or open another published comparison.
Taiwan ETF comparison FAQ
What does portfolio overlap measure?
For each common security, ETF Info takes the smaller of the two portfolio weights and adds those amounts. A higher percentage indicates more similar disclosed stock allocation.
Are historical returns shown with distributions?
Use the label shown for each metric. The long-period return fields are based on the return dataset, while the interactive price chart shows price returns and excludes distributions.
Can the lower-fee or higher-return ETF be considered the winner?
No single metric determines suitability. Fees, risk, liquidity, tracking exposure, distributions and portfolio construction answer different questions.
How to use this comparison
Fees, historical returns and overlap answer different questions. Portfolio overlap shows how similar the latest disclosed holdings are; it does not predict future performance or account for every trading cost, tax or distribution policy.